10/30/2026 · By The Comppound Gecko
What a SaaS Buyer Should Watch for in Link Building Services
Photo by Scott Graham on Unsplash
Good link building services can show you exactly how they earn links, let you approve each placement, and report on relevance and results. Poor ones sell a price list of sites, guarantee a quantity of links per month and talk mostly about domain scores. Since Google's spam policies treat paid links that pass ranking credit as a violation, what you're really buying matters for more than your budget.
A SaaS company has a particular reason to be careful. Your buyers read your category's publications, so a bad placement can be seen by the people you're trying to win. It's also tricky to undo, as these links are out in the world and may be hard to get removed.
What you might actually be buying
"Link building" covers very different services, and the sales page may not make it clear which one you're getting.
| Model | What happens | Main risk | When it fits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Link marketplaces | You choose sites from a list, and pay per placement | Likely a paid link violation, often on low-quality sites | Rarely a good choice |
| Guest post packages | The vendor places articles on sites it works with | Can match the spam policy, and sites may be made for this | Rarely, and only with full review |
| Digital PR | Pitching stories and data to journalists | Variable results, higher cost | You have a real story or data |
| Outreach as a service | The vendor pitches your assets to relevant sites | Quality depends on the operator | You have assets worth citing |
| Full SEO partner | Links are part of a plan alongside content | Can hide weak link work inside a retainer | You want one team accountable |
Note that the model doesn't guarantee quality. You'll find careful outreach firms and sloppy digital PR teams. But knowing the model helps you ask the right questions.
What Google's policies say
Google's spam policies name several things that are directly relevant to what's sold in this market:
- Buying or selling links that pass ranking credit, including exchanging goods or services for them
- Guest posts and advertorials with links that pass credit, particularly with keyword-rich anchors
- Excessive link exchanges and partner pages made only for cross-linking
- Automated link creation and low-quality directories
Paid placements themselves aren't banned. They're fine if marked with rel="sponsored" or rel="nofollow", and buying an ad or sponsorship for its audience is a perfectly normal thing to do. The problem is paying for a link intended to pass ranking credit, without disclosing it.
If a vendor says "our links are safe because they're on real sites", that doesn't address the question. Ask how the site owner benefits from publishing the link. If money changes hands, you need to know that.
Questions to ask before you sign
Say you run a 30-person SaaS selling procurement software, and you've got three proposals. Ask each of them these questions, and watch how they respond as much as what they say.
- "Exactly how do you get these links?" You want a real description of the process, including what's pitched and why a publisher would agree. "Our proprietary network" is a reason to leave.
- "Can I see ten recent placements for B2B software companies?" Visit them. Would you want your name there? Are they in a publication with real readers? Do many articles on the site carry links to unrelated businesses?
- "Do you pay publishers, directly or indirectly?" A vague answer is an answer.
- "Will I approve each site and article before it goes live?" The answer should be yes. You're the one who'll have to live with it.
- "Who writes the content, and who reads it?" Your brand's name is on it. Thin AI-written articles on low-quality blogs can harm how buyers see you.
- "Which of my pages will you build links to, and why?" A good answer involves your commercial pages and your actual gaps. A vendor who hasn't looked at your site is selling a commodity.
- "What if a link is removed?" There should be a replacement policy, and you should have a list to check against.
- "What do you do if I get a manual action?" It tests how seriously they take the risk.
Warning signs in a pitch
Some claims should end the conversation.
- Guaranteed numbers: "15 links per month at DR 50+" means they have inventory to sell. Editorial links can't be promised in those terms.
- Guaranteed rankings: Nobody controls Google's results, and Google warns about this kind of promise in its own guidance on hiring an SEO.
- Prices per link by domain score: It's a rate card for a marketplace.
- Anchor text you choose in advance: It's the pattern the spam policy describes.
- Sites that publish on anything: One blog covering crypto, gardening and B2B software exists to sell links.
- A hidden list of placements: "We can't reveal our sources" means you can't assess the risk you're carrying.
- Reports full of scores and no business outcomes: See our post on link building metrics.
Testimonials and case studies deserve some checking too. Ask which site it was, what period it covered and what else was happening. A claim of huge traffic growth means little without that context. A serious vendor will welcome the question.
What a fair engagement looks like
A sensible setup for the procurement SaaS starts with an audit of its current links, its competitors' links and the pages that need help most, followed by an agreed list of assets worth pitching, including any it still needs to create. The company keeps approval rights over every site and article, and a shared sheet lists each pitch, placement, URL, attribute and date.
Keep the first term short. Three months is enough to tell you about the process and the quality, though probably not the final effect on rankings. Reports should cover target page performance compared with pages not worked on, plus referral conversions.
Check who'd actually do the work too. Some agencies resell a freelancer or another agency. That's not automatically bad, but you should know whether the person you spoke to has anything to do with the outcome.
When not to buy this at all
Sometimes the honest conclusion is that links aren't your problem. If your commercial pages don't exist, are poorly written or don't match intent, links won't rescue them. See whether backlinks still matter to check before spending.
You might also have easy options you haven't tried: integration marketplaces and partner listings, unlinked mentions you could convert for free, podcast appearances for your founder, and customers who'd happily mention you. Do those first. They cost little, and any later vendor will start from a stronger position. They'll also give you a sense of what good looks like. To do more on your own, read link building outreach for SaaS.
If you've already bought some questionable links, don't panic. Our guide to toxic links and disavow explains when to act and when to leave them alone.
For a partner who treats links as one part of a joined-up plan and shows you all of the work, see what SEO Growth includes.
Frequently Asked Questions
They can be, if the provider earns editorial links through real outreach and has assets worth pitching. Packages that sell placements by the number are usually poor value and carry policy risk.
Paying someone to do outreach isn't the issue. Paying for links that pass ranking credit without marking them sponsored or nofollow breaks Google's spam policies.
Prices vary widely by model and market, so ask for current quotes. Be wary of very low per-link prices, which often point to marketplace placements or low-quality sites.
No one can guarantee rankings. A provider can commit to a process, transparency and reporting. Guarantees of a fixed number of high-score links usually mean they're selling existing inventory.
Still have questions? Talk to our team.

The Comppound Gecko
SEO and AI search for B2B SaaS
Comppound plans, produces and publishes search content for B2B SaaS companies. Every article is researched and drafted with AI, then reviewed by a member of the team for accuracy, clarity and usefulness before it is published.
Was this article helpful?
